<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moral Relativism Failure #1: No Standard to Judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/</link>
	<description>A Christian Blog about Christian Apologetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visitor</title>
		<link>http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-12378</link>
		<dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>Haha, just saw article written in 2007. The thoughts expressed in this article, are they still valid? If yes, then my answer above is too. I not, then just delete everything written here... 2007, oh boy... Christianity is truly lacking in more than one aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, just saw article written in 2007. The thoughts expressed in this article, are they still valid? If yes, then my answer above is too. I not, then just delete everything written here&#8230; 2007, oh boy&#8230; Christianity is truly lacking in more than one aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visitor</title>
		<link>http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-12377</link>
		<dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prudentmusings.com/apologetics/moral-relativism-failure-1-no-standard-to-judge/#comment-12377</guid>
		<description>&quot;...social do-gooders like Mother Teresa...&quot; This is just so out-of-place. Speaking of her service like this is just utter disrespectful, even if used as an analogy for the sake of clarification. Well, maybe it is how you truly see her as just a &quot;do-gooder&quot;, pity. Also, what you term &quot;moral relativism&quot; God through inspiration calls indifference (Rev. 3,15). More bothersome however, is the indifference of &quot;good&quot; men. Here I am referring to Christians or many so-called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;social do-gooders like Mother Teresa&#8230;&#8221; This is just so out-of-place. Speaking of her service like this is just utter disrespectful, even if used as an analogy for the sake of clarification. Well, maybe it is how you truly see her as just a &#8220;do-gooder&#8221;, pity. Also, what you term &#8220;moral relativism&#8221; God through inspiration calls indifference (Rev. 3,15). More bothersome however, is the indifference of &#8220;good&#8221; men. Here I am referring to Christians or many so-called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

